Thank you for that reference. The main question for me revolves around the implicit "progress ideology" in Lenski's theory--which certainly offers insight into the complexion of contemporary society. But I doubt that the evolution of social forms based on technical and informational technology alone will be sustainable.
You may find this interesting. Humanities Professor Eugene McCarraher traces the emergence of neoliberal capitalism and its evolution into what amounts to the dominant 'quasi-religion' of modern technocratic society. His book is titled "The Enchantments of Mammon". Point being, our belief systems (operating systems, really) have a profound effect on what we can do as socialized organisms. Nevertheless, there are no guarantees in my humble opinion.
Actually the "photograph" versus the "holograph" comparison is a great thinking-tool. Also, the "hierarchical" versus "decentralized" (or "power" versus "ability to participate") models seems to suggest (to me) concurrent multilevel evolution (one of my interests). We'll see. I'm going to dig into these ideas. Thanks for the tip.
I'm working though these videos. Very interesting but I can't respond just yet--mainly because I have to calibrate my research and nomenclature to intermesh with these ideas. Still, seems very interesting at first blush.
Thank you for that reference. The main question for me revolves around the implicit "progress ideology" in Lenski's theory--which certainly offers insight into the complexion of contemporary society. But I doubt that the evolution of social forms based on technical and informational technology alone will be sustainable.
You may find this interesting. Humanities Professor Eugene McCarraher traces the emergence of neoliberal capitalism and its evolution into what amounts to the dominant 'quasi-religion' of modern technocratic society. His book is titled "The Enchantments of Mammon". Point being, our belief systems (operating systems, really) have a profound effect on what we can do as socialized organisms. Nevertheless, there are no guarantees in my humble opinion.
Actually the "photograph" versus the "holograph" comparison is a great thinking-tool. Also, the "hierarchical" versus "decentralized" (or "power" versus "ability to participate") models seems to suggest (to me) concurrent multilevel evolution (one of my interests). We'll see. I'm going to dig into these ideas. Thanks for the tip.
I'm working though these videos. Very interesting but I can't respond just yet--mainly because I have to calibrate my research and nomenclature to intermesh with these ideas. Still, seems very interesting at first blush.
This is interesting stuff. It's going to take some time to absorb. Thanks!