96 Comments
User's avatar
SCB's avatar

People get mad if you don’t love what they love but get REALLY mad if you don’t hate what they hate

Expand full comment
michele burns's avatar

Hate is the new Love in America.

Expand full comment
Marilyn F's avatar

Haha!! I’m laughing because it’s TRUE!

Expand full comment
RAO's avatar

Yup.

Expand full comment
TurtleMountain's avatar

Good show., thanks for being a voice of reason in a complex world.

Expand full comment
Marilyn F's avatar

I agree. I feel grounded after a bout with Matt & Walter.

Expand full comment
John Powell's avatar

It’s not a fucking genocide. They keep repeating the word to override our common sense and to pretend they have the moral high ground.

Expand full comment
Foggy's avatar
4hEdited

When every offense is called a genocide, the word loses its meaning.

Expand full comment
Gym+Fritz's avatar

I appreciate your discussion re the stabbing.

I find myself not wanting to think about the images that I’ve seem, but I know that we must, eventually. The event encapsulates so much of what has gone wrong with our country the past decade; the deinstatutionalization of insane people, decarceration, the general breakdown of order, the inability to talk about racial issues plainly & honestly, not insisting on appropriate bail for repeat offenders, the way the press tried to censure & spin this story, and hide the truth, the idea that we should be passive and not defend ourselves, or others who are vulnerable, even the irony that the poor young woman was from war-torn Ukraine.

Nobody in their right mind wants to live in the world this killing represents. Good people need to wake up.

Expand full comment
FLGenX's avatar

This is why we can’t have nice things, like a community live stream with Matt and Walter. Because trolls get on and are just obnoxious. You may have to just stick to the prerecorded or close the comments if you aren’t going to kick assholes off. It’s not about free speech or dissenting opinions - they are there to distract and sabotage. Ruins it for everyone.

Expand full comment
Hillary's avatar

I agree. I find the chat scroll distracting even without the trolls.

Expand full comment
FLGenX's avatar

And the chat scrolling by covers up the comment that the moderator is highlighting - frustrating

Expand full comment
DarkSkyBest's avatar

Right on. Listening to them switch gears on topic discussions and reading the live stream . . . It was — illuminating.

Expand full comment
DaveL's avatar

Expand the screen, and the comments disappear.

Expand full comment
Ellen Evans's avatar

Looking forward to further discussion of The Hound of the Baskervilles, that civilized novel from a civilized time about some most uncivilized carryings on.

Expand full comment
michele burns's avatar

Yes! I’m loving this book.

Expand full comment
Ellen Evans's avatar

I hope that you, along with Walter and myself, are enjoying a reproduction of the monthly installments published starting April 1901 in The Strand. Too lovely. Even the arrangement of lines, illustrations, the typeface, all speak, along with Sir Arthur's prose, of a time more leisured, more contemplative, than ours. It's a great place to visit, too bad I can't live there.

Expand full comment
michele burns's avatar

I ordered the Strand edition of the book but sadly it’s going to take a while to arrive. In the meantime I have various online editions. Anyway, the writing is delectable..witty dialog and fantastic descriptions. Plus it really is the kind of book you want to immerse yourself in when the days are getting shorter and the nights are nippy…

Expand full comment
Ellen Evans's avatar

You can find a free loan of a replica at Internet Archive (archive dot org). They have several.

Expand full comment
michele burns's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Ellen Evans's avatar

My pleasure! Sharing is a good thing, so I have heard . . . and I like to.

Expand full comment
Carlos Marighella's avatar

I just heard about that stabbing today. Even though it horrifies me, I'm glad you two showed the video and discussed it so I have a better understanding of what happened.

I also appreciate your arguments about NOT wanting to discuss Israel. If I may add my two cents...Matt and Walter are their own bosses here at Substack, so they do have a right to pick and choose what they want to discuss and what they don't want to discuss. So many people here make it sound as though if Matt and Walter weigh in on this issue, that will resolve it. No, it won't; it will just pour more gasoline on the fire. Every other media outlet is covering this issue, so you can always look elsewhere for news and insight.

Looking forward to more discussion of "The Hound of the Baskervilles" this Friday.

Expand full comment
Cam Brown's avatar

Pleased to see that Matt and Walter are not diving in to the middle

east morass.

Expand full comment
John Powell's avatar

Quit apologizing. Fuck them.

Expand full comment
BRetty's avatar

Lots to discuss ... Matt you sure had a busy week last.

Expand full comment
norica's avatar

Impossible to keep up

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

Can’t wait.

Expand full comment
Richard James's avatar

“I’m really mad at you for not having a strong binary opinion about something you don’t have expertise in, because I need you to help me feel more secure in my anger!!”

Expand full comment
Debbie Mitchell's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
michele burns's avatar

….the knot of inconvenient nagging little doubts not addressed by the transparently thin “colonialist” indoctrination and lost $$$ and time of their wasted youth.

Expand full comment
Michael Karg's avatar

Loved the show, especially Walter Kirn. (I went to Buchtel H S with his dad, "Punch"). What Matt misses about Bari's success is her website's gathering of many civil conservatives, and allowing them almost any type comment on The Free Press articles. I don't think she could have planned it, the timing was just right, and she benefited.

Expand full comment
Konstantin Doren's avatar

Researchers have since uncovered major inaccuracies in the Times article, and police interviews revealed that some witnesses had attempted to contact authorities. In 1964, reporters at a competing news organization discovered that the Times article was inconsistent with the facts, but they were unwilling at the time to challenge Times editor Abe Rosenthal. In 2007, an article in the American Psychologist found "no evidence for the presence of 38 witnesses, or that witnesses observed the murder, or that witnesses remained inactive".[8] In 2016, the Times called its own reporting "flawed", stating that the original story "grossly exaggerated the number of witnesses and what they had perceived".[9]

Expand full comment
Mister Delgado's avatar

I assume this is in reference to the Times' report on the killing of Kitty Genovese?

Expand full comment
Rev Wazoo's avatar

They couldn't get the Steele dossier published by buzzfeed without including it in the Intelligence assessment so they needed that badly and bent everything to achieve that opening the floodgates.

Expand full comment
The Wright Stuff's avatar

Matt, you accused Gladwell of ‘not packing anything down there’ but one has to wonder what you’re packing with your mealy-mouthed vacillating about Israel.

Let me simplify it for you— you and Kirn tell us you have a major problem with us sending billions in weapons to Ukraine that would be better spent at home. Where is that same concern when it comes to Israel? If you add up all of the US economic support to that tiny country, you’ll see Ukraine is chump change.

Walt was a a little more honest, and revealed why he’s so reticent, when he told us he feared the blowback.

Expand full comment